![]() |
A replica of a Chilesaurus diegosuarezi skeleton, a vegetarian dinosaur.
An oddball, vegetarian dinosaur with the silhouette of a flesh-ripping
velociraptor, whose fossilised remains were unearthed in southern Chile 13
years ago, is a missing link in dino evolution, researchers said Wednesday.
A revised assessment of the kangaroo-sized Chilesaurus, reported in the
journal Biology Letters, bolsters a theory unveiled earlier this year that
threatens to upend a long-standing classification of all dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs were the monarchs of Earth for 160 million years until a space
rock collided with the planet 65.5 million years ago and wiped out those
confined to land.
The survivors, which could fly, are the direct ancestor of today's
birds.
"Chilesaurus genuinely helps fill an evolutionary gap between two
big dinosaur groups," said co-author Paul Barrett, president of Britain's
Palaeontographical Society and a researcher at the Natural History Museum.
When first presented to the world in 2015, Chilesaurus despite its
penchant for plants was lumped together with theropods, the suborder of
meat-eating dinos that not only includes fleet-footed velociraptors but
Tyrannosaurus rex, the ultimate carnivore.
Experts acknowledged at the time, however, that it was an awkward fit.
One described the beast as "the most bizarre dinosaur ever found."
An upright posture, powerful hind legs and foreshortened front limbs
were all reminiscent of theropods.
But an inverted, bird-like hip structure and flattened, leaf-shaped
teeth proof of an exclusively vegetal diet suggested that it also shared traits
with another major suborder, the Ornithischia.
Well-known ornithischians include Triceratops and the three-tonne
Stegosaurus, which boasted large armoured plates along its spine and a brain
the size of a walnut.
"Chilesaurus initially looked like an earlier offshoot of the
theropod line, but it seemed suspicious that it had all these adaptations for
eating plants," Barrett said.
It lived about 150 million years ago, far earlier than the handful of
theropods known to have turned away from meat, he pointed out.
- Common ancestor -
To verify Chilesaurus' place in the dino family tree, Barrett and
Matthew Baron of the University of Cambridge analysed more than 450 anatomical
features of early dinosaurs.
What they found confirmed a hunch.
"We realised that it was not a strange, early plant-eating
theropod, but rather a strange plant-eating animal that was an offshoot of this
other group, Ornithischia," Barrett said.
Reassigning Chilesaurus to a new family tree might seem like something
only a dino lover could find exciting.
But the new affiliation has major implications.
For most of the last century, experts have agreed that theropods were
more closely related to a third major evolutionary branch, the Sauropods, which
included long-necked beasts such as Diplodocus and Brachiosaurus.
But the neither-fish-nor-foul Chilesaurus shows that the fearsome
killers under the theropod umbrella shared, in fact, a greater affinity with the
docile Ornithischia menagerie.
This was the bold theory that Baron and Barrett, along with other
colleagues, proposed in a landmark study published last March in the journal
Nature.
"Our reorganisation was putting Ornithischia and theropods much
closer together, and this new animal helps cement that relationship,"
Barrett explained.
"Chilesaurus gives us more confidence that this rearrangement was
correct because it has a combination of features found in those two
groups."
The first dinosaur emerged some 228 million years ago. The new findings
support the idea that theropods and ornithischians shared a common ancestor as
early as 225 million years ago, not long after the dino saga began.
Ornithischia thrived for more than 100 million years, but dead-ended
when the rogue rock smashed into what, today is the Yucatan peninsula in
Mexico.
The impact probably created a massive firestorm followed by a
decades-long winter that destroyed vegetation, the starting point in the
dinosaurs' food chain.
Most theropods were wiped out too, although
the forerunners of modern birds persevered.
|
Comments
Post a Comment